Harvey

Generative AI and agents built for legal drafting, review and research.

Custom quoteLegal AI assistant and agent platform

No user reviews yet. Be the first to rate it.

Visit website
Harvey website screenshot
Harvey website

Quick Facts

DeveloperHarvey
Websiteharvey.ai
Agent typeLegal AI assistant and agent platform
Best forLarge and midsize law firms and corporate legal departments handling high volumes of drafting, diligence and document review.
Not ideal forSolo practitioners and small firms looking for transparent, low-cost monthly pricing.
Pricing modelCustom enterprise contract (reported per-seat, annual)
Starting priceCustom quote
Pricing detailsNo public pricing. Reported to be sold as annual per-seat licenses with seat minimums and optional add-ons.
Free planNo
Free trialDemo only
ChannelsWeb app, Microsoft 365 Copilot (reported)
What it does on its ownAgents carry out multi-step legal tasks such as redline analysis and diligence review; lawyers review and approve all output.
IntegrationsLexisNexis, EUR-Lex, EDGAR, Microsoft 365 Copilot, DocuSign, Intapp
PlatformsWeb
Company HQSan Francisco, USA
Company founded2022
Agent launched2022
Details last verified28 October 2026
CategoriesEnterprise, Law Firms, Legal
User ratingNo reviews yet

Harvey says 80% of Am Law 100 firms and five of the Fortune 10 use its software, and investors valued the company at $15.5 billion in September 2026. The product drafts, reviews and researches legal documents, and runs prebuilt and custom agents for tasks such as redline analysis, due diligence tables and translation.

Founded in 2022 by Winston Weinberg and Gabe Pereyra, Harvey sells to law firms, in-house legal departments and professional services firms, almost always under enterprise contracts.

How It Works

Assistant is the chat interface: lawyers ask questions, draft and edit text and summarize long documents, with answers linked back to their sources. Vault stores thousands of documents for bulk review, using review tables, targeted questions and batch summaries. Workflow agents handle defined jobs such as redlining or translating a Word or PDF file, and an Agent Builder introduced in March 2026 lets teams create their own without code.

Harvey draws on knowledge sources including LexisNexis, EUR-Lex and EDGAR alongside web search and a firm’s own uploads. It reportedly lets users route work to models from Anthropic, Google and OpenAI, and connects with Microsoft 365 Copilot. Shared libraries of prompts, playbooks and workflows let firms standardize how practice groups use it.

Pricing

Harvey does not publish prices and sells through its sales team. Third-party reports describe annual, per-seat contracts with seat minimums and optional add-ons, though reported per-seat figures vary widely and could not be confirmed. There is no free plan or self-serve trial, and smaller firms should expect a sales process similar to other enterprise legal software.

What to Watch Out For

The cost and contract structure put Harvey out of reach for many solo lawyers and small practices. Like any generative AI tool, it can produce errors, so every output needs a lawyer’s review before it reaches a client or court. Harvey’s own help center notes that the system lacks real-time internet access beyond its connected sources and that its translations are not a substitute for certified translation. Firms should also check how matters and client data are segregated before uploading confidential files to Vault.

Recent News

Harvey raised $200 million at an $11 billion valuation in March 2026, in a round co-led by GIC and Sequoia. Six months later, on September 9, 2026, it announced a $550 million round at a $15.5 billion valuation co-led by Lightspeed and Diffusion, and acquired Guardrails AI, an AI agent security company and its fourth acquisition of the year.

Features

  • Assistant for drafting, editing and summarizing with linked sources
  • Vault for bulk review of thousands of documents
  • Prebuilt workflow agents such as redlining and translation
  • Agent Builder for no-code custom agents
  • Review tables and bulk summarization
  • LexisNexis, EUR-Lex and EDGAR knowledge sources
  • Shared libraries of prompts, playbooks and workflows

Pros and Cons

Pros

  • Built specifically for legal work
  • Wide adoption among Am Law 100 firms
  • Large-scale document review in Vault
  • Custom agents without code
  • Well funded and expanding through acquisitions

Cons

  • No public pricing
  • enterprise sales only
  • Out of budget for many small firms
  • Outputs still require lawyer review
  • No real-time internet access beyond connected sources

User Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to rate Harvey.

Write a Review