QQodo

Qodo Reviews Every Pull Request With a Team of Specialist Agents

Nvidia, Walmart, Red Hat and Intuit run their pull requests through Qodo, a code review platform whose 2.0 release on February 4, 2026 split each review across several specialist agents. Seven weeks later, Qodo raised a $70 million Series B led by Qumra Capital and reported the top score on Martian’s Code Review Bench at 64.3%.

Qodo fits engineering teams that merge a lot of code, especially code written by AI agents, and want it checked against their own standards. Pro Team credits cost $0.012 each, about $1.67 per review by Qodo’s own estimate, and a 14-day trial is free. Qodo scores 9.1/10 on our scale.

Qodo’s Funding, Benchmark and Customer Figures

The launch release, the Series B coverage and Qodo’s own site supply these facts.

The benchmark figures deserve a careful read. Qodo built the injected-bug benchmark cited at launch itself. The Martian Code Review Bench result comes from a third party, which carries more weight for a buyer comparing review tools.

TechCrunch’s coverage cited a survey in which 95% of developers said they do not fully trust AI-generated code, while only 48% consistently review it before committing. That gap is the problem Qodo sells into. Every team that adopts a coding agent creates more code than its reviewers can read line by line.

The angel list is unusual. Investors from OpenAI and Meta backing a review tool suggests that people who build code-generating models see verification as a separate job.

Inside a Qodo Review, Agent by Agent

Qodo plugs into the git host and reviews each pull request when it opens. Developers see findings as comments on the pull request or inside their IDE.

Specialist Agents Over One Generalist

Qodo 2.0 replaced a single review model with a group of expert agents. One looks for critical bugs, another for duplicated logic, another checks the change against its linked ticket and another enforces team rules. Each pulls its own context from the codebase, past pull requests and earlier review decisions.

Rules Learned From PR History

Qodo’s Rules and Skills Lifecycle reads a team’s past pull requests and turns repeated review comments into written standards. A rule such as “all API handlers log the request ID” becomes a check that runs on every new pull request. Founder Itamar Friedman told TechCrunch that quality depends on “organizational standards, past decisions, and tribal knowledge.”

Cross-Repo Review and the Software Map

Cross Repo Review flags a change in one repository that would break a service in another. The newer Software Map shows how repos, services and contracts connect, so reviewers can see what a change touches beyond its own files.

Agentic Toolbox for Coding Agents

Qodo now ships a CLI toolbox that coding agents can call while they work. Qodo names Codex, Claude and Kiro as agents it pairs with. The idea is to catch problems during generation, before a pull request exists.

What Developers Still Decide

Qodo comments and suggests fixes. A human still accepts or rejects each finding and merges the code. Loopup’s CTO, quoted on Qodo’s site, says it handles about 90% of the first review pass before a person steps in.

Connecting Qodo to a Repository

Setup starts with the git host. An admin installs Qodo on GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket or Azure DevOps and picks the repositories to cover. From then on, each new pull request triggers a review. Developers who want findings earlier can add the plugin for VS Code, a JetBrains IDE or Visual Studio and run checks before they push.

Rules can be written by hand or learned. Qodo reads past pull requests, spots review comments that keep coming up and proposes them as rules. A tech lead approves the rules worth keeping. Over time the rule set grows with the team, and Qodo’s Wisdom Base adds business requirements and PR history as context for each review.

Qodo Pro Team Credits and Enterprise Terms

Qodo publishes its credit price and three pack sizes. Review counts per pack are Qodo’s own estimates.

Monthly Qodo Bills at Three Team Sizes

Qodo’s pack estimates put one review at about 139 credits, or about $1.67. We used that rate for three teams.

A three-person startup merging 60 pull requests a month needs about 8,300 credits, or roughly $100 a month.

A 10-developer team merging 40 pull requests a week, about 173 a month, needs about 24,100 credits. That comes to roughly $289 a month, or about $29 per developer.

A 50-developer group merging 200 pull requests a week, about 867 a month, would need about 120,000 credits, close to $1,444 a month. At that size the Enterprise plan, with its custom terms and on-premises options, is worth a sales call.

Costs Beyond the Credit Packs

Enterprise customers who bring their own model keys pay their model provider directly, so their total cost includes those API bills. Self-hosted and air-gapped installs also need the customer’s own servers. Pro Team buyers face no annual commitment, which keeps the downside of a trial month small.

These figures assume average pull requests. Large refactors use more credits per review, so teams should log real usage during the trial.

Qodo Against GitHub Copilot Cloud Agent, Devin and OpenHands

All four tools touch pull requests. Qodo is the only one built around review and governance first.

Copilot and Devin generate code and also review it. Qodo sits on the other side: its job is to check whatever humans or agents produce. Many teams will run one of the others to write code and Qodo to review it. Price comparisons are rough, since Copilot and Devin bundle review into broader subscriptions while Qodo charges per review. A team that already pays for Copilot Business should test whether Qodo’s learned rules and cross-repo checks catch issues Copilot’s review misses before adding a second bill. Our coding agents and IT and DevOps agents lists cover more options.

Where Qodo Keeps Code and Model Traffic

Security teams usually ask two questions about a review tool: where the code goes and which model reads it. Qodo answers the first with zero data retention, meaning code is analyzed and then discarded, and with SOC 2 Type II certification from an independent audit.

The second answer depends on the plan. Enterprise customers can bring their own keys for OpenAI, Anthropic or Azure OpenAI, or point Qodo at a self-hosted model. They can also choose single-tenant SaaS, an on-premises install or a fully air-gapped deployment. Banks, defense suppliers and healthcare firms that cannot send code to a shared cloud have a path to use the product. Admins on Enterprise also get SSO and SAML for access control.

Engineering Groups That Gain Most From Qodo

Qodo suits teams where reviewers are the bottleneck. When AI agents write a growing share of code, the number of pull requests rises faster than the number of senior engineers who can review them. Qodo takes the first pass on each one.

Platform and DevOps teams that own shared services gain from cross-repo checks. A change to a shared library or API contract can break several downstream services, and Qodo flags that before merge.

It also fits companies with written or unwritten standards that new hires keep missing. Learned rules turn those standards into checks. Firms in regulated sectors can use the on-premises or air-gapped deployment to keep code inside their own network.

When a Smaller Team May Hold Off on Qodo

A solo developer or a team of two who review each other’s code in minutes may not need a dedicated review agent yet. The credit cost is low, but the setup of rules and repos pays off mostly at higher pull request volume.

Teams with very large monorepos should test credit use first. A pull request that touches hundreds of files will cost more than Qodo’s average estimate, and the monthly bill will track the size of changes as well as their count.

Teams on Gerrit need the Enterprise plan for support. Teams that want an agent to write features from tickets will want a code-generation agent first and can add Qodo later.

Speed and Test Output in G2 Feedback

On G2, Qodo holds 4.5 stars from 122 reviews. The most-cited positives are how quickly developers pick it up, time saved and how well suggestions reflect the surrounding code.

The negatives are few in number. Four reviewers mention slow performance, three describe a learning curve and three say generated unit tests needed fixes before they ran. The test complaints relate to Qodo’s test-generation features. Reviews written about the multi-agent review product specifically are still building up, and Qodo could add more public case studies with review accuracy numbers.

Qodo’s 2026 Releases and Funding in Order

• February 4, 2026: Qodo 2.0 launches with multi-agent review and context drawn from past pull requests.
• March 30, 2026: Qodo raises a $70 million Series B led by Qumra Capital, with total funding at $120 million.
• 2026: Qodo’s site presents Qodo 3.0, adding Software Map and the Agentic Toolbox for coding agents.

How Qodo Scores for Review-Heavy Teams

Qodo scores 9.1/10. Security and integrations lead: SOC 2 Type II, zero data retention, air-gapped deployment and support for every major git host. Pricing is published and needs no annual commitment. Autonomy scores lower than a code-writing agent because Qodo reviews and suggests while people decide.

For a team whose reviewers cannot keep up with AI-written pull requests, Qodo is a well-documented choice. Run the trial on your busiest repository and track credits per review before choosing a pack.

What Engineering Managers Ask About Qodo

How Much Does a Qodo Review Cost?

Pro Team credits cost $0.012 each. Qodo estimates 2,500 credits cover about 18 reviews, so one review costs about $1.67 on average. Larger pull requests use more.

Does Qodo Store Our Source Code?

Qodo says it keeps zero data retention: code is analyzed and then discarded. It is SOC 2 Type II certified, and Enterprise customers can bring their own model keys or deploy on-premises.

How Long Does Qodo Take to Set Up?

Qodo says setup takes minutes per repository. An admin connects the git host and selects repos, and reviews start on the next pull request. Learned rules build up as Qodo reads more of the team’s PR history.

Which Git Platforms Work With Qodo?

GitHub, GitHub Enterprise Server, GitLab cloud and self-managed, Bitbucket Cloud and Data Center, and Azure DevOps. Gerrit is supported on Enterprise.

Is There a Free Version of Qodo?

Qodo offers a 14-day trial with unlimited reviews and no card. After that, teams buy pooled credits on Pro Team or sign an Enterprise contract.

How Did Qodo Perform on Independent Benchmarks?

TechCrunch reported that Qodo ranked first on Martian’s Code Review Bench with 64.3%, more than 10 points ahead of the next tool and 25 points ahead of Claude Code Review.

Is Qodo 2.0 the Same as Qodo 3.0?

Qodo 2.0 introduced multi-agent review in February 2026. The current site calls the platform Qodo 3.0 and adds Software Map and the Agentic Toolbox on top of the same review agents.

Can Qodo Review Code Written by Other AI Agents?

Yes. That is its main use. Qodo reviews any pull request, and its CLI toolbox works alongside coding agents such as Codex, Claude and Kiro.