Ffillmore by Metaview

fillmore Takes the Sourcing Shift Off a Recruiter’s Desk

In the case study Metaview chose to share, fillmore sourced, researched and contacted 52 candidates, booked five screening calls, and the role went from first search to signed offer in 30 days. Metaview made fillmore available on September 30, 2026, the same day it announced a $60 million Series C led by Insight Partners. The agent covers the top of a hiring funnel: finding people, writing to each of them, following up and putting screens on the calendar.

fillmore comes from a company recruiting teams already know. Metaview’s interview notes tool is used by more than 7,000 companies and rates 4.8 out of 5 on G2. The open questions are the usual ones for a brand-new agent: no published price, no fillmore-specific reviews yet, and integration details you will confirm in a demo. It scores 8.3 out of 10 on our scale.

Metaview’s Path From Interview Notes to fillmore

We put Metaview’s dated announcements in order. Each row links to the source.

The customer count jumped from more than 5,000 in August to more than 7,000 by the end of September. That is the base fillmore launches into: teams that already let Metaview sit in their interviews. For them, adding an agent at the sourcing end is a smaller step than bringing in a new vendor.

The Reval deal is the other signal. Reval was not a software company. For about three years it operated as a recruiting firm that used AI to source, screen and deliver candidates for clients such as FabFitFun, Enver Studio and LangChain. Metaview bought a team that had already run AI sourcing as a service, then made fillmore available about seven weeks later.

What fillmore Costs

Metaview does not publish fillmore prices, and G2’s Metaview listing states that pricing is not listed by the vendor. Expect a quote based on seats or hiring volume. Thousands of teams joined the waitlist before launch, so ask about onboarding timing as well as price.

Budget Questions for the Sales Call

• Is fillmore priced per recruiter seat, per role or per booked screen?
• Is it sold on its own or only with Metaview’s interview intelligence product?
• Which outreach channels are included, and are there sending limits?
• Does the contract include the AI screening agent when it ships?
• What does a pilot on two or three roles cost?

A per-outcome model, such as a price per booked screen, is the easiest to compare with agency fees. If Metaview offers one, set it against what you pay a contingency recruiter for the same roles.

How fillmore Moves a Candidate From Search to Screen

Metaview describes fillmore as a coworker for the top of the funnel. Based on its announcements, the work runs in four stages, with recruiters involved at the decision points.

Sourcing and Research

fillmore finds candidates for a role and researches each one. In the shared case study, it researched all 52 people it contacted, which is what allows the next step to be personal.

Personalized Outreach

It writes outreach for each candidate based on that research. Metaview stresses personalization, which is the part recruiters usually spend the most time on and the part templated sequences do worst.

Follow-Ups

fillmore manages follow-ups on its own. Most replies in recruiting come after a second or third touch, so this is where an agent saves the most clock time.

Booked Screening Calls

When a candidate is interested, fillmore books the screening call. From there, Metaview’s existing products take over: its agents can run structured screening conversations and turn the human interview into notes and insights.

Where Recruiters Stay in the fillmore Loop

Metaview says people remain involved at key decision points. In a demo, ask exactly which ones: approving the target profile, approving outreach copy, or approving who gets a screen.

The Metaview Agents That Surround fillmore

fillmore is one piece of a larger set. In its Series C announcement, Metaview listed what its agents already do across the hiring process: source candidates, review applications, run structured screening conversations and turn human interviews into usable insights. fillmore is the first it calls a coworker, meaning it owns a whole stretch of work.

This matters for how you buy. A team can start with interview notes, which is what most Metaview customers use today, then add fillmore for sourcing, and later the dedicated screening agent when it ships. Each step feeds the next, since the notes from a fillmore-booked screen land in the same system that sourced the candidate. Metaview also runs a training program called 10x Recruiting for recruiters and talent leaders, which suggests it expects recruiters to change how they spend their week once agents take the sourcing load. For buyers, that program is a useful way to see Metaview’s view of the recruiter role before signing.

Reading the fillmore Case Study

Metaview shared one result in detail, and its numbers are worth unpacking for planning.

If a team saw the same rate across 10 open roles and wanted five screens for each, fillmore would need to contact roughly 520 people. That is a single case study, so treat the ratio as a starting point for your own pilot. The useful part is the shape: an agent that handles the 52 contacts lets a recruiter spend time on the five calls.

Metaview frames the need with industry figures of its own: applications per recruiter up 412 percent and nearly 45 days to fill an average role. Those numbers explain why the company aimed its first coworker at sourcing and outreach.

A 30-Day fillmore Pilot Plan

Because fillmore is new and priced by quote, the safest way in is a short pilot with numbers you set in advance. This plan uses the metrics Metaview itself reported in its case study.

• Week 1: pick roles. Choose two or three open roles with clear profiles and enough candidates in the market. Avoid your rarest role; it will distort the ratio.
• Week 1: set checkpoints. Agree with Metaview where recruiters approve the target profile and outreach copy before anything is sent.
• Weeks 2 and 3: let it run. Track three numbers each week: candidates contacted, replies, and screens booked.
• Week 3: spot-check research. Read ten of fillmore’s candidate summaries and check them against the profiles. G2 reviewers of Metaview’s notes product mention inaccuracies, so this check matters.
• Week 4: compare. Set contacts per booked screen against the case study’s ratio of about ten to one, and against what your recruiters achieved on similar roles last quarter.

At the end you will know the cost per booked screen once Metaview’s quote is known, and how many recruiter hours the agent replaced. Those two figures decide whether to extend fillmore to more roles.

What to Measure Beyond Booked Screens

Booked screens are the headline, but two quieter numbers matter. The first is the share of screens that move to a second interview, which tells you whether fillmore’s sourcing finds the right people or just responsive ones. The second is candidate feedback on the outreach. Personal messages that read well protect your employer brand, and a recruiter should read a sample each week of the pilot.

fillmore Compared With Juicebox, Alex, hireEZ and LinkedIn Hiring Assistant

fillmore’s edge is the handoff into Metaview’s screening and interview tools, which none of the others offer in one company. Juicebox is the choice for teams that want to start today on a published price. Alex fits teams whose bottleneck is screening volume. Our recruiting agents page lists more.

Hiring Teams That Suit fillmore

In-house talent teams already on Metaview are the clearest fit. Their interviews are captured, so fillmore’s sourcing joins a process Metaview already sees end to end. Fast-growing startups hiring engineers, sales staff and marketers, where outreach volume is high and every role needs personal messages, will feel the time savings first.

Recruitment agencies are a natural fit too. Reval, which Metaview bought, was itself an AI-led recruiting firm serving more than 100 enterprises and agencies, so the workflow fillmore inherits was built for client delivery.

Teams That May Prefer to Wait on fillmore

Small companies filling a handful of roles a year may find a quote-based enterprise product heavy. A self-serve tool with a monthly price is quicker to start. Teams in heavily regulated hiring, such as public sector or healthcare roles with strict outreach rules, should wait until Metaview documents channels, consent handling and audit trails for fillmore.

Teams whose main bottleneck is screening hundreds of inbound applicants may want to wait for Metaview’s dedicated AI screening agent, which it says is still in development.

Integration, Review and Outreach Details to Confirm With Metaview

• ATS connection. Ask which applicant tracking systems fillmore writes to, and whether it creates candidate records or only notes.
• Outreach channels. Confirm whether fillmore sends from your email domain, LinkedIn or both, and how sending volume is capped.
• Approval points. Metaview says people stay involved at key decisions; get the list in writing.
• Accuracy. Some G2 reviewers of Metaview’s notes product mention inaccuracies, so plan human checks on research summaries during a pilot.
• Capacity. Metaview plans to grow from 80 to 250 staff, and thousands of teams joined the waitlist; ask about onboarding dates.

What Metaview Users Say on G2

Metaview holds 4.8 out of 5 on G2. On its comparison page, 119 reviewers rate ease of use at 9.6 out of 10, 110 rate how well it meets requirements at 9.3, and 102 rate support quality at 9.5. Ease of use is the most mentioned positive, cited 70 times, followed by AI technology at 33. The main negatives are inaccuracy, mentioned 12 times, and general notes that improvement is needed, mentioned 8 times. These reviews cover Metaview’s interview notes product, since fillmore is too new for reviews of its own.

How fillmore Scores Before Its First Reviews

fillmore scores 8.3 out of 10 on our scale. Autonomy is high: it runs sourcing, outreach, follow-ups and booking with people at checkpoints. User sentiment is strong for Metaview as a company. Pricing value is the weakest criterion, since there is no published price, and integrations are scored conservatively until Metaview documents fillmore’s ATS and channel connections.

For a talent team already on Metaview, a pilot on two or three hard-to-fill roles is the sensible test. Track contacts per booked screen against the case study’s ratio of about ten to one.

Recruiter Questions About fillmore

Is fillmore Available Now or Still on a Waitlist?

Metaview said fillmore was available on September 30, 2026. Before that, thousands of teams had joined a waitlist, so onboarding may be phased.

How Much Does fillmore Cost?

Metaview does not publish a price. Request a quote and ask whether it is billed per seat, per role or per booked screen.

Does fillmore Interview Candidates?

fillmore books screening calls. Metaview’s other agents can run structured screening conversations, and a dedicated AI screening agent is in development.

Who Built fillmore?

Metaview, a London and San Francisco company backed by Insight Partners, GV, Seedcamp and others. It added the Reval team, led by Seth Tilliss and Aditya Gupta, in August 2026.

Can Recruitment Agencies Use fillmore for Client Roles?

Metaview has not published agency-specific terms, but the Reval team it acquired ran AI-led sourcing for more than 100 enterprises and agencies. Ask Metaview about per-client setups in your demo.

How Does fillmore Differ From Juicebox?

Juicebox has published per-seat pricing and focuses on search and outreach. fillmore books screens and connects to Metaview’s interview tools, with pricing by quote.